The framers' European contemporaries were equally interested in the issue of intergenerational public debt,
and probably helped to shape American discourse on the topic. Herbert Sloan observes that the French Encyclopédies
were highly successful in promulgating the view that long-term economic debts are unfair to future generations.
f204 Montesquieu, whose works were
extremely influential amongst the founders, announced that, "The power of the purse must reside exclusively
in the legislature, but appropriations must not be made in perpetuity or for long periods."f205
Hume, discussing government's penchant to create long term public debt, suggested "it would scarcely be
more imprudent to give a prodigal son a credit in every banker's shop in London, than to impower a statesman
to draw bills, in this manner, upon posterity." f206
In the final analysis, however, most of the founding American statesmen allowed that long-term public debt was acceptable in certain limited circumstances. Madison, for instance, took notice that some debts, such as those incurred for repelling a conquest, benefit the unborn and that other debts may be incurred principally for the benefit of posterity.
"There seems then to be a foundation in the nature of things, in the relation which one generation bears to another, for the descent of obligations from one to another. Equity requires it. Mutual good is promoted by it. All that is indispensable in adjusting the account between the dead and the living is to see that the debits against the latter do not exceed the advances made by the former." f207
<<previous Stewardship contents next -Part III>>
©Constitutional
Law Foundation, 50 West 36th Street, Eugene, Oregon 97405
Phone: 541-683-4500, Fax: 541-683-4492, clf@conlaw.org
web site design: www.mlwebb.com